Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hara, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Input, triggering and poverty of the stimulus in the second language acquisition of Japanese passives

Masahiro Hara

Truman State University, mhara{at}truman.edu

This article adopts an input perspective in examining a poverty-of-the stimulus (POS) learning situation in second language acquisition (SLA). Analysis of grammaticality judgement data from 81 English-speaking and 85 Chinese-speaking learners of Japanese isolates triggering input that informed English learners of subtle semantic properties of the ni direct passive underdetermined by second language (L2) input. The study shows a sufficient correlation in the case of English learners between acquisition of the ni direct passive's triggering properties (available through input) and acquisition of its POS properties (unavailable through input). Importantly, those properties are direct consequences of affectivity, an underlying semantic property of the ni direct passive. That correlation does not obtain in the case of Chinese learners due to a positive first language (L1) effect. Additional corroborating evidence comes from acquisition of another Japanese passive, the ni yotte, for which no correlation was found between its non-triggering and non-POS properties for either English or Chinese learners as those properties are available through input. The article proposes that English learners' computation of a target-like conceptual representation of the triggering input leads to the restructuring of their lexical—conceptual representation of the ni direct passive.

Key Words: second language acquisition • poverty of the stimulus in L2 • triggering input in L2 • L2 lexical conceptual structure • Japanese passives

References

  • Birdsong, D. 1989: Metalinguistic performance and interlanguage competence. New York: Springer.
  • Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. and Ioup, G. 1988: The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research 4, 1—32.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Carroll, S.E. 2001: Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • —— 2004: Commentary: some general and specific comments on input processing and processing instruction. In VanPatten, B., editor, Processing instruction: theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 293—309.
  • —— 2005: Input and SLA: adults' sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning 55, 79—138.[CrossRef]
  • Carroll, S.E. and Swain, M. 1993: Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 357—86.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P. and Harrington, M. 2002: What gets processed in Processing Instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's `Processing Instruction: An update'. Language Learning 52, 805—23.[CrossRef]
  • Dekydtspotter, L. and Sprouse, R.A. 2001: Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English—French interlanguage. Second Language Research 17, 1—35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Anderson, B. 1997: The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process—result distinction in English—French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition 6, 297—332.
  • Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Swanson, K. 2001: Reflexes of mental architecture in second-language acquisition: The interpretation of `combien' extractions in English—French interlanguage. Language Acquisition 9, 175—227.
  • Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Thyre, R. 1999/2000: The interpretation of quantification at a distance in English—French interlanguage: domain specificity and second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 8, 265—320.
  • Emonds, J. 2000: Lexicon and grammar: the English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Feng, F. 1993: On influences of the mother tongue: Chinese language: on the learning processes of the Japanese passive voice. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 41, 388—98.
  • Fox, D. and Grodzinsky, Y. 1998: Children's passive: a view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 311—32.[CrossRef]
  • Goodman, L. and Kruskal, W. 1954: Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49, 732—64.[CrossRef]
  • Gregg, K. 2001: Learnability and second language acquisition theory. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152—80.
  • Grimshaw, J. and Vikner, S. 1993: Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events. In Reuland, E. and Abraham, W., editors, Knowledge and language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 143—55.
  • Haegeman, L. 1985: The get-passive and Burzio's generalization. Lingua 66, 53—77.[CrossRef]
  • Han, Z. 2000: Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: the case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics 21, 78—105.[Abstract]
  • Hara, M. 2002: On the acquisition of Japanese passives by English speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Hara, M. and Ma, C.-H. 2004: Why do L2 learners optionally choose a certain divergent analysis of TL over a TL-like one? In F oster-Cohen, S., Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A. and Ota, M., editors, EUROSLA Yearbook 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7—40.
  • Hashimoto, M. 1988: The structure and typology of the Chinese passive construction. In Shibatani, M., editor, Passive and voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 329—54.
  • Hawkins, R. 2001: The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17, 345—67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 2003: `Representational deficit' theories of (adult) SLA: evidence, counterevidence and implications. The 13th European Second Language Association Annual International Conference
  • Hawkins, R. and Chan, C.Y.-H. 1997: The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: the `failed functional features hypothesis'. Second Language Research 13, 187—226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hoshi, H. 1994: Passive, causative, and light verbs: a study on theta role assignment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
  • —— 1999: Passives. In Tsujimura, N., editor, The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 191—235.
  • Howard, I. and Niyekawa-Howard, A. 1976: Passivization. In Shibatani, M., editor, Syntax and semantics: Japanese generative grammar. New York: Academic Press, 201—37.
  • Inagaki, S. 2001: Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 157—70.
  • —— 2002: Japanese learners' acquisition of English manner-of-motion verbs with locational/directional PPs. Second Language Research 18, 3—27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Inoue, K. 1976: Henkei-bunpoo to nihon-go: transformational grammar and Japanese. Vol. Zyoo (1). Tokyo: Taisyuukan.
  • Izumi, S. and Lakshmanan, U. 1998: Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research 14, 62—101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jackendoff, R. 1983: Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • —— 1990: Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • —— 1991: Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41, 9—45.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • —— 1996: The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 305—54.[CrossRef]
  • Jacobsen, W. 1992: The transitive structure of events in Japanese. Tokyo: Kurosio.
  • Juffs, A. 1998: The acquisition of semantics—syntax correspondences and verb frequencies in ESL materials. Language Teaching Research 2, 93—123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 2000: An overview of the second language acquisition of links between verb semantics and morpho-syntax. In Archibald, J., editor, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 187—227.
  • Kuno, S. 1973: The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kuroda, S.-Y. 1979: On Japanese passives. In B edell, G., Inoue, K., Kobayashi, E. and Muraki, M., editors, Explorations in linguistics. Tokyo: Kenkyusha, 305—47.
  • Lasnik, H. and Fiengo, R. 1974: Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535—71.
  • Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1999: Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Matthews, T. and Strolovitch, D., editors, Semantics and linguistic theory. Volume IX. University of California, Santa Cruz, CA: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 199—223.
  • Li, C. and Thompson, S. 1981: Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Masuko, M. 1996: Expressing adversity. Language Sciences 18, 195—211.[CrossRef]
  • Masuoka, T. 1982: On the semantics of Japanese passives. Gengo Kenkyu 82, 48—64.
  • Montrul, S. and Slabakova, R. 2002: The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses preterite and imperfect. In Perez-Leroux, A. and Liceras, J., editors, The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 115—51.
  • Pustejovsky, J. 1992: The syntax of event structure. In Levin, B. and Pinker, S., editors, Lexical and conceptual semantics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 47—81.
  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B. 2001: An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77, 766—97.[CrossRef]
  • SchYtze, C. 1996: The empirical base of linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Schwartz, B.D. 1998: The second language instinct. Lingua 106, 133—60.[CrossRef]
  • Schwartz, B.D. and Gubala-Ryzak, M. 1992: Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research 8, 1—38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schwartz, B.D. and Sprouse, R.A. 1994: Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 317—68.
  • —— 1996: L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12, 40—72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Shi, D. 1997: Issues on Chinese passive. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 25, 41—70.
  • Shibatani, M. 1990: The language of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shirai, Y. 2000: The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: an integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 327—61.[CrossRef]
  • Shirai, Y. and Andersen, R.W. 1995: The acquisition of tense—aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743—62.[CrossRef]
  • Shirai, Y. and Kurono, A. 1998: The acquisition of tense—aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning 48, 245—79.
  • Slabakova, R. 1999: The parameter of aspect in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 15, 283—317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 2003: Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research 19, 42—75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Slabakova, R. and Montrul, S. 2002: On viewpoint aspect interpretation and its L2 acquisition: a UG perspective. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., editors, The L2 acquisition of tense—aspect morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 363—95.
  • —— 2003: Genericity and aspect in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition 11, 165—96.
  • Tanaka, M. 1992: Examination of failure to use the passive by Japanese language learners. Language Research Bulletin 6, 152—68.
  • —— 1993: A study of JSL students' interlanguage: an analysis of the use of the passive in complex/compound sentences. Language Research Bulletin 8, 87—117.
  • Tenny, C. 1992: The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Sag, I.A. and Szabolcsi, A., editors, Lexical matters, Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1—28.
  • Thomas, M. 2002: Development of the concept of `the poverty of the stimulus '. Linguistic Review 19, 51—71.
  • Ting, J. 1995: A non-uniform analysis of the passive construction in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
  • Trahey, M. 1996: Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long-term effects. Second Language Research 12, 111—39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Trahey, M. and White, L. 1993: Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 181—204.
  • VanPatten, B. 2002: Processing Instruction: an update. Language Learning 52, 755—803.[CrossRef]
  • —— 2004: Processing instruction: theory, research, and commentary Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S. and Overstreet, M., editors, 2004: Form—meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Watabe, M., Brown, C. and Ueta, Y. 1991: Transfer of discourse function: passives in the writing of ESL and JSL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics 29, 115—34.
  • Watanabe, A. 1996: Case absorption and wh-agreement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • White, L. 1991: Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7, 133—61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 1992: On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research 8, 120—37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 2003: Second language acquisition and universal grammar Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yang, J.C. and Akahori, K. 1998: Error analysis in Japanese writing and its implementation in a computer assisted language learning system on the World Wide Web. CALICO 15, 47—66.

Second Language Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 419-458 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267658307080331
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hara, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?