Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haznedar, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The acquisition of tense—aspect in child second language English

Belma Haznedar

Bogaziçi University, haznedab{at}boun.edu.tr

The aim of this article is two-fold: to test the Aspect Hypothesis, according to which the early use of tense—aspect morphology patterns by semantic/aspectual features of verbs, and Tense is initially defective (e.g. Antinucci and Miller, 1976; Bloom et al., 1980; Andersen and Shirai, 1994; 1996; Robison, 1995; Shirai and Andersen, 1995; Bardovi-Harlig, 1998; Shirai, 1998); and to test Gavruseva's aspectual features account, according to which inherent aspectual properties of the verbs such as telicity and punctuality determine which verbs will be non-finite and which verbs will not (Gavruseva, 2002; 2003; 2004) in child L2 acquisition. Based on longitudinal data from a Turkish child second language (L2) learner of English, we present counter evidence for both hypotheses. First, it is shown that despite the fact that the early production of past tense morphology occurs exclusively with punctual predicates, data from copula be, auxiliary do and pronominal subjects do not show any evidence for defective tense. Second, contrary to what is predicted in Gavruseva's hypothesis, the rate of uninflected punctual verbs is much higher than that of uninflected non-punctual verbs in the child L2 grammar.

Key Words: child L2 acquisition • L2 tense—aspect morphology • Underspecification of Aspect Hypothesis • optional/root infinitives in L2

References

  • Aksu, A. 1978: Aspect and modality in the child's acquisition of the Turkish past tense. PhD dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  • Aksu-Koç, A. 1988: The Acquisition of aspect and modality: the case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • —— 1998: The role input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense—aspect morphology: evidence from Turkish. First Language 18, 255—80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Andersen, R.W. 1991: Developmental sequences: the emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Huebner, T. and Ferguson, C.A., editors, Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 305—24.
  • Andersen, R.W. and Shirai, Y. 1994: Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133—56.
  • —— 1996: Primacy of aspect in language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T., editors, Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 527—70.
  • Antinucci, F. and Miller, R. 1976: How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3, 169—89.
  • Bach, E. 1986: The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5—16.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1995: A narrative perspective on the development of the tense—aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 263—91.
  • —— 1998: Narrative structure and lexical aspect: conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense—aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 471—508.[CrossRef]
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Bergström, A. 1996: The acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Canadian Modern Language Review 52, 308—30.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Reynolds, D.W. 1995: The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly 29, 107—31.[CrossRef]
  • Behrens, H. 2001: Cognitive—conceptual development and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes: the development of time concepts and verb tense. In Bowermann, M. and Levinson, S.C., editors, Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 450—74.
  • Bickerton, D. 1975: Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: Cmabridge University Press.
  • —— 1984: The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 173—88.
  • Bloom, L., Lifter, K. and Hafitz, J. 1980: Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56, 386—412.[CrossRef]
  • Borer, H. 1994: The projection of arguments. In B enedicto, E. and Runner, J., editors, University of Massachussetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 19—47.
  • Bromberg, H. and Wexler, K. 1995: Null subjects in child wh-questions. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26, 221—47.
  • Bronckart, J.P. and Sinclair, H. 1973: Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 2, 107—30.[CrossRef]
  • Brown, R. 1973: A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. and Schumann, J. 1974: Testing hypotheses about second language acquisition: the copula and the negative in three subjects. Working Papers in Bilingualism 3, 80—96.
  • Chomsky, N. 1995: The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Comrie, B. 1976: Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • de Haan, G. 1986: A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb-placement in Dutch. In de Haan, G. and Zonneveld, W., editors, Formal parameters of generative grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 15—30.
  • de Swart, H. 1998: Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 347—85.[CrossRef]
  • Dowty, D. 1979: Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Dulay, H.C. and Burt, M.K. 1974: Natural sequences in child second language strategies. Language Learning 24, 37—53.[CrossRef]
  • Dulay, H.C. and Burt, M.K. and Krashen, S. 1982: Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Enç, M. 1987: Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 633—57.
  • Ferdinand, A. 1996: The acquisition of the subject in French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, Leiden University.
  • Gavruseva, E. 2002: Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5 (2), 109—30.[CrossRef]
  • —— 2003: Aktionsart, aspect and the acquisition of finiteness in early child grammar. Linguistics 41, 723—55.[CrossRef]
  • —— 2004: Root infinitives in child second language English: an aspectual features account. Second Language Research 20, 335—71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gavruseva, E. and Lardiere, D. 1996: The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In Stringfellow, A., Cahana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E. and Zukowski, A., editors, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 225—36.
  • Grondin, N. and L. White. 1996: Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition 1, 1—34.
  • Guéron, J. and Hoekstra, T. 1989: The chains and constituent structure of auxiliaries. In Cardinaletti, A., Cinque, G. and Giusti, G., Constituent structure: Papers from the Venice GLOW, 35—99. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • —— 1995: The temporal interpretation of predication. In Cardinaletti, A. and Guasti, M.T., editors, Small clauses, syntax and semantics, 28, 77—107.
  • Haznedar, B. 2001: The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 1—39.[CrossRef]
  • —— 2003: The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research 19, 1—41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B.D. 1997: Are there Optional Infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A., editors, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257—68.
  • Hoekstra, T. and Hyams, N. 1995: The syntax and interpretation of dropped categories in child language: a unified account. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 14. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 123—36.
  • —— 1996: Missing heads in child language. In Koster, C. and Wijnen, F., editors, Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition conference 1995. Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition, 251—60.
  • —— 1998: Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106, 81—112.[CrossRef]
  • Hoekstra, T., Hyams, N. and Becker, M. 1996: The underspecification of Number and the licensing of root infinitives. In Stringfellow, A., Cahana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E. and Zukowski, A., editors, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 293—306.
  • Ionin, T. and Wexler, K. 2002: Why is `is' easier than `-s'?: acquisition of tense—agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 18, 95—136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lakshmanan, U. 1993/94: The boy for the cookie: some evidence for the non-violation of the Case Filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 3, 51—97.
  • Lakshmanan, U. 1994: Universal Grammar in child second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Lardiere, D. 1998: Case and Tense in the `fossilized' steady state. Second Language Research 14, 1—26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • —— 1999: Suppletive agreement in second language acquisition. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H. and Tano, C., editors, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 386—39.
  • —— 2000: Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Archibald, J., editor, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, Oxford: Blackwell, 103—29.
  • MacWhinney, B. and Snow, C. 1985: The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12, 271—96.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Paradis, J., LeCorre, M. and Genesee, F. 1998: The emergence of tense and agreement in child L2 French. Second Language Research 14, 227—57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Pensalfini, R. 1995: Pronoun case errors, both syntactic and morphological. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26, 305—24.
  • Powers, S.M. 1995: The acquisition of pronouns in Dutch and English: the case for Continuity. In MacLaughlin, D. and McEwen, S., editors, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 439—50.
  • Prévost, P. 1997: Truncation and Root Infinitives in second language acquisition of French. In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A., editors, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Pres, 21, 453—64.
  • Prévost, P. and White, L. 2000: Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language? Evidence from Tense and Agreement. Second Language Research 16, 103—33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Radford, A. 1995: Children-architects or brickies? In MacLaughlin, D. and McEwen, S., editors, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 1—19.
  • Rispoli, M. 1994: Pronoun case overextensions and paradigm building. Journal of Child Language 21, 157—72.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rizzi, L. 1993/94: Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: the case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3, 371—93.
  • —— 1994: Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 151—76.
  • Robison, R.E. 1990: The primacy of aspect: aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 315—30.
  • —— 1995: The Aspect Hypothesis revisited: a cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics 16, 344—70.[Abstract]
  • Rohde, A. 1996: The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics 34, 1115—37.
  • —— 2002: The aspect hypothesis in naturalistic L2 acquisition: what uninflected and non-target-like verb forms in early interlanguage tell us. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., editors, The L2 acquisition of tense—aspect morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 199—220.
  • Salaberry, R. 2002: Tense and aspect in the selection of Spanish past tense verbal morphology. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., editors, The L2 acquisition of tense—aspect morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 397—415.
  • Sano, T. and Hyams, N. 1994: Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 24, Amherst, Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 543—58.
  • Schlyter, S. 1990: The acquisition of tense and aspect. In Meisel, J., editor, Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children. Dordrecht: Foris, 87—121.
  • Schütze, C.T. and Wexler, K. 1996: Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. In Stringfellow, A., Cahana-Amitay, D., Hughes, E. and Zukowski, A., editors, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 670—81.
  • Shirai, Y. 1998: The emergence of tense—aspect morphology in Japanese: universal disposition. First Language 18, 281—310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Shirai, Y. and Andersen, R.W. 1995: The acquisition of tense—aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743—62.[CrossRef]
  • Slabakova, R. 1999: The parameter of aspect in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 15, 283—317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • —— 2001: Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Slobin, D.I. 1985: Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D.I., editor, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: theoretical Issues, volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Smith, C.S. 1983: A theory of aspectual choice. Language, 59: 479—501. —— 1991 [ 1997]: The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.[CrossRef]
  • Suppes, P. 1973: The semantics of children's language. American Psychologist 88, 103—14.
  • Torrence, H. and Hyams, N. 2004: On the role of aspect in determining Finiteness and Temporal interpretation of early grammar. Proceedings of the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition conference 10, Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap (LOT). Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
  • Travis, L. 1991: Derived objects, inner aspect and the structure of VP. Unpublished paper presented at North Eastern Linguistic Society, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
  • Vainikka, A. 1993/94: Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition 3, 257—325.
  • Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M. 1996: The early stages in adult L2 syntax: additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research 12, 140—46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Vendler, Z. 1967: Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56, 143—60.
  • Verkuyl, H. 1972: On the compositional nature of the aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • —— 1989: Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 39—94.[CrossRef]
  • Wexler, K. 1994: Optional Infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, D. and Hornstein, N., editors, Verb movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305—50.
  • White, L. 2003: Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6, 129—41.[CrossRef]
  • Wijnen, F. 1996: Temporal reference and eventivity in root infinitives. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 12, 1—25.
  • Zobl, H. and Liceras, J. 1994: Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning 44, 159—80.[CrossRef]

Second Language Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 383-417 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267658307080330
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haznedar, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?