Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckman, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Iverson, G. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners

Fred R. Eckman

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Gregory K. Iverson

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

This paper is intended as a contribution to an evergrowing body of literature on the role played by principles and parameters of Universal Grammar in second-language acquisition theory.

A recent paper by Broselow and Finer (1991) proposes that markedness as defined in terms of the multivalued Minimal Sonority Distance (MSD) parameter is definitive in their subjects' knowledge of certain consonant clusters in syllable onsets. This parameter provides for the characterization of the various types of consonant clusters allowed in the onsets of syllables in different languages. The object of Broselow and Finer's study was to determine whether L2 learners find clusters which are relatively more marked according to the MSD parameter to be more difficult to learn than cluster types which are relatively less marked.

The present paper, however, argues that it is typological markedness (Hawkins, 1987) rather than sonority distance per se which better explains L2 learners' knowledge of English clusters in syllable onsets. In line with Clements' (1990) comprehensive investigation of sonority relations within the syllable, this paper argues that markedness alone suffices to account for the observed interlanguage patterns. Using Clements' principles, which themselves actually follow from the overall theory of markedness, the interlanguage obstruent results reported by Broselow and Finer fall out automatically.

Second Language Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, 234-252 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839300900302
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
E. P. Altenberg
The perception of word boundaries in a second language
Second Language Research, October 1, 2005; 21(4): 325 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
B. Hancin-Bhatt
Optimality in second language phonology: codas in Thai ESL
Second Language Research, July 1, 2000; 16(3): 201 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
A. R. James
Second language phonology anno 1994
Second Language Research, October 1, 1994; 10(3): 189 - 192.
[PDF]

Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
M. Young-Scholten
On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology
Second Language Research, October 1, 1994; 10(3): 193 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]