This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hawkins, R. Articles by Bazergui, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English

University of Essex

Richard Towell

University of Salford

Nives Bazergui

University of Essex

White (1989) has shown that L1 English-speaking learners of L2 French appear to be more successful in acquiring the postverbal location of French manner and frequency adverbs than L1 French-speaking learners of L2 English are in acquiring the preverbal location of English manner and frequency adverbs. One implication of recent work by Pollock (1989) on the structure of English and French clauses is, however, that the task of acquiring the placement of manner and frequency adverbs should be the same for both sets of learners, because English provides learners with as much positive syntactic evidence for preverbal manner/frequency adverbs as French does for the postverbal location of such adverbs. The problem, then, is to explain why there should be this difference in success. On the basis of a detailed study of the developing intuitions of English-speaking adult learners of L2 French it is suggested in this article that the English-speakers' success is only apparent. Both groups of learners have great difficulty in resetting a parametrized property of the functional category Agr, but the English- speaking learners of French are able to make use of nonparametrized properties of Universal Grammar to handle surface syntactic differences between English and French, properties which are not so readily available to the French-speaking learners of English. It is suggested that this finding is in line with an emerging view about the role of parametrized functional categories in second language acquisition.

Second Language Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, 189-233 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839300900301


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. M. Tsimpli and M. Dimitrakopoulou The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition Second Language Research, April 1, 2007; 23(2): 215 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Rule and E. Marsden The acquisition of functional categories in early French second language grammars: the use of finite and non-finite verbs in negative contexts Second Language Research, April 1, 2006; 22(2): 188 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Conradie Investigating the acquisition of the Split-IP parameter and the V2 parameter in second language Afrikaans Second Language Research, January 1, 2006; 22(1): 64 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Yuan The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: against inevitability of thematic-verb raising in second language acquisition Second Language Research, July 1, 2001; 17(3): 248 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. B. Mandell On the reliability of grammaticality judgement tests in second language acquisition research Second Language Research, January 1, 1999; 15(1): 73 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. D. Schwartz and R. A. Sprouse L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model Second Language Research, January 1, 1996; 12(1): 40 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]