Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedgcock, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Well-formed vs. ill-formed strings in L2 metalingual tasks: specifying features of grammaticality judgements

John Hedgcock

University of Houston

The use of metalingual tasks in L2 acquisition research has recently been challenged by a number of critics on the grounds that they may constitute only an indirect and unreliable reflection of learner competence. Recent research involving metalingual judgements tests has revealed that learners' reactions to well-formed and ill-formed strings emerge largely as a result of the cognitive processes brought about by the particular characteristics of the linguistic stimulus. Moreover, the assumption that learner judgements tap into a unitary or stable knowledge source has been called into question, since a number of knowledge systems and levels of awareness have been found to contribute to learner performance in L2. Because disagreement continues about the usefulness of metalingual judgements and the information they can provide, this article aims to clarify currently established perspectives on this issue, particularly with respect to the question of how learners' tolerance of ill-formedness compares to their acceptance of well-formedness. It will be argued that specific aspects of the form and content of grammatical and ungrammatical test strings may strongly influence the saliency of certain malformations, and impact the decision-making process in systematic ways.

Second Language Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1-21 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839300900101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
H. Reinders
Learner uptake and acquisition in three grammar-oriented production activities
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2009; 13(2): 201 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]