Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom

Lydia White

McGill University

This paper focuses on a parametric difference between French and English, namely the issue of whether or not the language allows verb movement. The lack of verb-raising in English causes a potential learnability problem for francophones, as far as English adverb placement is concerned. In particular, an adverb in English is not allowed to interrupt a verb and its direct object, in contrast to French. It is argued in this paper that form-focused classroom instruction, including negative evidence, is more effective in helping L2 learners to arrive at the appropriate properties of English than positive input alone. An experimental study on the effectiveness of teaching adverb placement was conducted with I 1 and 12 year-old francophone learners of English. One group (n = 82) was explicitly instructed on adverb placement, and another on ques tion formation (n = 56). Subjects were tested on a variety of tasks relating to adverb placement; they were pretested, and post-tested twice, immediately after the instructional period, and again five weeks later. Some of the subjects were followed up a year after the original testing. Results show significant differences between the two groups: only the group that received positive and negative evidence that was specifically oriented towards adverb placement came to know that adverbs may not interrupt the verb and object. The results from the follow up, however, suggest that this knowledge is not retained in the long-term.

Second Language Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 133-161 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839100700205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
M. Hara
Input, triggering and poverty of the stimulus in the second language acquisition of Japanese passives
Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 419 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. Truscott
Instance theory and Universal Grammar in second language research
Second Language Research, July 1, 1998; 14(3): 257 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
T. Pica
Second language teaching and research relationships: a North American view
Language Teaching Research, January 1, 1997; 1(1): 48 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
M. Trahey
Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long-term effects
Second Language Research, April 1, 1996; 12(2): 111 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
A. Juffs
Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition
Second Language Research, April 1, 1996; 12(2): 177 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
A. Vainikka and M. Young-Scholten
Gradual development of L2 phrase structure
Second Language Research, January 1, 1996; 12(1): 7 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
B. D. Schwartz and R. A. Sprouse
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Second Language Research, January 1, 1996; 12(1): 40 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
B. MacWhinney
Language-specific prediction in foreign language learning
Language Testing, November 1, 1995; 12(3): 292 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. Archibald
A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology
Second Language Research, October 1, 1994; 10(3): 215 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
R. Hawkins, R. Towell, and N. Bazergui
Universal Grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English
Second Language Research, October 1, 1993; 9(3): 189 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
S. M. Gass
Second language acquisition: past, present and future
Second Language Research, June 1, 1993; 9(2): 99 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
L. White
On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak
Second Language Research, June 1, 1992; 8(2): 120 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
B. D. Schwartz and M. Gubala-Ryzak
Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement
Second Language Research, February 1, 1992; 8(1): 1 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]