This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clahsen, H. Articles by Muysken, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The UG paradox in L2 acquisition

University of Düsseldorf

Pieter Muysken

University of Amsterdam

There is a considerable amount of recent evidence that stable principles of Universal Grammar (UG) are available to adult second language (L2) learners in structuring their intuitions about the target language grammar. In contrast, however, there is also evidence from the acquisition of word order, agreement and negation in German that there are substantial differences between first language (L1) and L2 learners. In our view, these differences are due to UG principles guiding L1, but not L2 acquisition. We will show that alternative ways of accounting for the L1/L2 differences are not successful. Finally we will deal with the question of how our view can be reconciled with the idea that L2 learners can use UG principles to some extent in the evaluation of target sentences.

Second Language Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1-29 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026765838900500101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Duffield, A. Matsuo, and L. Roberts Factoring out the parallelism effect in VP-ellipsis: English vs. Dutch contrasts Second Language Research, October 1, 2009; 25(4): 427 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Bardel and Y. Falk The role of the second language in third language acquisition: the case of Germanic syntax Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 459 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Vainikka and M. Young-Scholten The early stages in adult L2 syntax: additional evidence from Romance speakers Second Language Research, April 1, 1996; 12(2): 140 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Juffs Semantics-syntax correspondences in second language acquisition Second Language Research, April 1, 1996; 12(2): 177 - 221. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Juffs Book reviews: Huebner, T. and Ferguson, C.A., editors, 1991: Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 435 pp. DFL 60, paper. ISBN 90 272 2466 8 Second Language Research, October 1, 1995; 11(3): 270 - 278. [PDF]

				H. Clahsen and U. Hong Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: new evidence from reaction-time experiments Second Language Research, February 1, 1995; 11(1): 57 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Young-Scholten On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology Second Language Research, October 1, 1994; 10(3): 193 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Hakansson and S. D. Collberg The preference for Modal + Neg: an L2 perspective applied to Swedish L1 children Second Language Research, June 1, 1994; 10(2): 95 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. MacLaughlin Book reviews : White, L. 1989: Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, xii + 198 pp. (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 1) Second Language Research, October 1, 1991; 7(3): 245 - 256. [PDF]

				A. Hulk Parameter setting and the acquisition of word order in L2 French Second Language Research, February 1, 1991; 7(1): 1 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]