This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fidler, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reconceptualizing fossilization in second language acquisition: a review

Georgetown University, ahe3{at}georgetown.edu

In recent fossilization literature, two problems have been raised repeatedly (e.g. Han, 2003; Long, 2003; Birdsong, 2004). First, the term ‘fossilization’ lacks a unified definition and, second, it has not been adequately described empirically. The works reviewed here seek to address this situation. Han (2004) describes a conceptual framework within which to understand existing work on fossilization, and Han and Odlin (2005) present a collection of empirical and analytical studies that help to ameliorate both the definitional and empirical shortcomings of contemporary fossilization research. Taken together, these volumes provide an admirable synthesis of existing research and problems, as well as noteworthy analyses of how to move forward empirically. For the moment, however, idiosyncratic perspectives on fossilization still prevail.

Second Language Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, 398-411 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0267658306sr273ra


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?