Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slabakova, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is there a critical period for semantics?

Roumyana Slabakova

University of Iowa, Roumyana-slabakova{at}uiowa.edu

This article reviews recent research on the second language acquisition of meaning with a view of establishing whether there is a critical period for the acquisition of compositional semantics. It is claimed that the functional lexicon presents the most formidable challenge, while syntax and phrasal semantics pose less difficulty to learners. Findings from the neurofunctional imaging (PET, fMRI) and electrophysiology (ERPs) of L2 comprehension are reviewed and critically examined. Since it is argued that experimental tasks suggesting differential acquisition of L2 syntax and semantics are in need of linguistic refinement, further evidence is marshalled from behavioural studies of L2 acquisition of semantics to fill in the current gap in L2 comprehension modelling. The 15 studies reviewed here point to no apparent barrier to ultimate success in the acquisition of phrasal semantics.

Second Language Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, 302-338 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0267658306sr270oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
D. Lardiere
Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition
Second Language Research, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 173 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Journal of BilingualismHome page
J. Rothman
Knowledge of A/A'-dependencies on subject extraction with two types of infinitives in non-native Portuguese adult bilingualism
International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 111 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
J. L. Mueller
The influence of lexical familiarity on ERP responses during sentence comprehension in language learners
Second Language Research, January 1, 2009; 25(1): 43 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
J. Rothman
Sometimes They Use It, Sometimes They Don't: An Epistemological Discussion of L2 Morphological Production and Its Use as a Competence Measurement
Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 609 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]