This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sabourin, L. Articles by de Haan, G. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system

University of Groningen, sabourin{at}uoregon.edu

Laurie A. Stowe

University of Groningen

Ger J. de Haan

University of Groningen

In this article second language (L2) knowledge of Dutch grammatical gender is investigated. Adult speakers of German, English and a Romance language (French, Italian or Spanish) were investigated to explore the role of transfer in learning the Dutch grammatical gender system. In the first language (L1) systems, German is the most similar to Dutch coming from a historically similar system. The Romance languages have grammatical gender; however, the system is not congruent to the Dutch system. English does not have grammatical gender (although semantic gender is marked in the pronoun system). Experiment 1, a simple gender assignment task, showed that all L2 participants tested could assign the correct gender to Dutch nouns (all L2 groups performing on average above 80%), although having gender in the L1 did correlate with higher accuracy, particularly when the gender systems were very similar. Effects of noun familiarity and a default gender strategy were found for all participants. In Experiment 2 agreement between the noun and the relative pronoun was investigated. In this task a distinct performance hierarchy was found with the German group performing the best (though significantly worse than native speakers), the Romance group performing well above chance (though not as well as the German group), and the English group performing at chance. These results show that L2 acquisition of grammatical gender is affected more by the morphological similarity of gender marking in the L1 and L2 than by the presence of abstract syntactic gender features in the L1.

Second Language Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1-29 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0267658306sr259oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Montrul and J. Yoon Putting parameters in their proper place Second Language Research, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 291 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Slabakova Features or parameters: which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study? Second Language Research, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 313 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Chirsheva Gender in Russian--English code-switching International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 63 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Unsworth Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch Second Language Research, July 1, 2008; 24(3): 365 - 395. [Abstract] [PDF]