This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Montrul, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: exploring some differences and similarities

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, montrul{at}uiuc.edu

This study compares the linguistic knowledge of adult second language (L2) learners, who learned the L2 after puberty, with the potentially ‘eroded’ first language (L1) grammars of adult early bilinguals who were exposed to the target language since birth and learned the other language simultaneously, or early in childhood (before age 5). I make two main claims: (1) that the L1 grammar of bilinguals at a given stabilized state (probably endstate) resembles the incomplete (either developing or stabilized) grammars typical of intermediate and advanced stages in L2 acquisition; and (2) that despite similar patterns of performance, when language proficiency is factored in, early bilinguals are better than the L2 learners, probably due to exposure to primary linguistic input early in childhood.

I offer empirical evidence from an experimental study testing knowledge of the syntax and semantics of unaccusativity in Spanish, conducted with English-speaking L2 learners and English-dominant Spanish heritage speakers living in the USA. I consider recent treatments of unaccusativity and language attrition within the generative framework (Sorace, 1999; 2000a; 2000b), that offer a unifying account of the formal parallels observed between these two populations I discuss how input, use and age may explain differences and similarities in the linguistic attainment of the two groups.

Second Language Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, 199-249 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0267658305sr247oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. G. Bar-Shalom and E. Zaretsky Selective attrition in Russian-English bilingual children: Preservation of grammatical aspect International Journal of Bilingualism, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 281 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Montrul Review article: Second language acquisition welcomes the heritage language learner: opportunities of a new field Second Language Research, October 1, 2008; 24(4): 487 - 506. [PDF]

				J. Rothman Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese International Journal of Bilingualism, December 1, 2007; 11(4): 359 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Montrul and K. Potowski Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish-English Bilingual Children International Journal of Bilingualism, September 1, 2007; 11(3): 301 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]