This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lakshmanan, U. Articles by Selinker, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know?

Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, usha{at}siu.edu

Larry Selinker

Birkbeck College, University of London

In this article, we address the important issue of ‘how we know what learners know’ based on evidence from second language (L2) learners’ spontaneous speech samples gathered longitudinally. We first examine some of the problems involved in the analysis of spontaneous speech, with focus on L2 studies within the generative framework. Next, we revisit the issue of the comparative fallacy in L2 research. We first consider the effects of the comparative fallacy in relation to analyses of interlanguage with a target language bias. Next, we extend the comparative fallacy to include interlanguage analysis where the bias is towards the native language. We argue that the comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies, regardless of the nature of the bias (i.e., target language or native language) can lead to the underestimation and/or overestimation of the learners’ linguistic competence.

Second Language Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 393-420 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765830101700406


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Pallotti An Operational Definition of the Emergence Criterion Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 361 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Dominguez Review article: Knowledge of features in fossilized second language grammars Second Language Research, April 1, 2007; 23(2): 243 - 260. [PDF]

				Y. Shirai The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: a reply to Lardiere, 2003 Second Language Research, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 51 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Han `To be a native speaker means not to be a nonnative speaker' Second Language Research, April 1, 2004; 20(2): 166 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Lardiere Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001 Second Language Research, April 1, 2003; 19(2): 129 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]