Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition

Peter Robinson

Aoyama Gakuin University, peterr{at}cl.aoyama.ac.jp

Individual differences in resource availability, and the patterns of cognitive abilities they contribute to, are important to:

• explaining variation between learners in the effectiveness of second language (L2) instructional treatments;

• describing differences in implicit, incidental and explicit L2 learning processes; and

• explaining child-adult differences in acquisition processes, and therefore to any general theory of second language acquisition (SLA).

In this article I describe a framework for research into the effects of cognitive abilities on SLA which is based on four interlocking hypotheses. These hypotheses are drawn from research in psychology, education and SLA and, where possible, I present evidence to support each of them. The hypotheses are:

1) the Aptitude Complex Hypothesis;

2) the Ability Differentiation Hypothesis;

3) the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis; and

4) the Fundamental Similarity Hypothesis.

The hypotheses, and the relationships between them, define an Aptitude Complex/Ability Differentiation framework for further examining the influence of individual differences in cognitive abilities on SLA, and for developing a theoretically motivated measure of language learning aptitude. I argue that such research should adopt the interactionist approach described by Snow (1994) to identifying individual difference/learning condition interactions at a number of levels. I illustrate some of these interactions.

Second Language Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 368-392 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765830101700405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
E. Wagner
Book review: Zoltan Dornyei, 2005: The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 270 pp. $29.95 (PB). ISBN 0 8058 6018 5
Language Teaching Research, October 1, 2007; 11(4): 506 - 509.
[PDF]


Home page
Applied LinguisticsHome page
A. Mackey
Feedback, Noticing and Instructed Second Language Learning
Applied Linguistics, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 405 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]