This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hawkins, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition

University of Essex, roghawk{at}essex.ac.uk

The evidence that native language acquisition is possible only because children are born with an innately-determined language faculty - Universal Grammar - is considerable. The evidence that the same innate ability is involved in second language acquisition (SLA) by older learners is superficially less clear. There are differences both in the context of acquisition and the nature of development. One recent approach suggests that only ‘poverty of the stimulus’ phenomena - where neither the first language (L1) nor the second language (L2) are possible sources for L2 representations - can provide incontrovertible evidence for Universal Grammar (UG) in SLA. I argue that while ‘poverty of the stimulus’ phenomena are important landmarks in theory development in SLA research, they are not the most compelling reason for assuming the involvement of UG. More compelling are attempts to explain L2-L1 differences. The latter are likely to lead to real progress, not only in understanding the nature of SLA but also the structure and organization of the language faculty itself.

Second Language Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 345-367 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765830101700404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hara Input, triggering and poverty of the stimulus in the second language acquisition of Japanese passives Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 419 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-k. I. Leung Third language acquisition: why it is interesting to generative linguists Second Language Research, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 95 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Thomas Two textbook representations of second language acquisition and Universal Grammar: 'access' and 'constraint' Second Language Research, October 1, 2003; 19(4): 359 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Wakabayashi Contributions of the study of Japanese as a second language to our general understanding of second language acquisition and the definition of second language acquisition research Second Language Research, January 1, 2003; 19(1): 76 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]