This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Foster-Cohen, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

First language acquisition... second language acquisition: ‘What’s Hecuba to him or he to Hecuba?’

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, s.fostercohen{at}ling.canterbury.ac.nz

Second language (L2) research appeals to first language acquisition research frequently and standardly. It is important, however, to take stock from time to time of the uses that second language acquisition (SLA) makes of its sister field. Whether we use first language (L1) research to generate or bolster the importance of a particular research question, to argue for a fundamental similarity or a fundamental difference between the two sorts of acquisition, or to offer guidance in the formulation of research paradigms, it is important that we do so with our critical eyes open.This article examines the possible and specific relationships between L1 acquisition and SLA, with the aim of showing that a number of assumptions warrant closer inspection. It begins by examining the expressions ‘first language acquisition’ and ‘second language acquisition’, suggesting that the syntactic and lexical parallelism between the two masks important issues internal to the fields involved. It then explores problems in distinguishing L1 from L2 acquisition from three different perspectives: individual language learner histories, the data, and the mechanisms proposed to account for the two types of acquisition. Finally, it takes a brief look at the sociology of L1 and L2 studies, and suggests that second language study has yet to assume fully its rightful place in the academy.

Second Language Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 329-344 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765830101700403


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Selinker, D.-E. Kim, and S. Bandi-Rao Linguistic structure with processing in second language research: is a 'unified theory' possible? Second Language Research, January 1, 2004; 20(1): 77 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Thomas Two textbook representations of second language acquisition and Universal Grammar: 'access' and 'constraint' Second Language Research, October 1, 2003; 19(4): 359 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]