Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, N.
Right arrow Articles by Dunham, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exploring native and non-native intuitions of word frequency

Norbert Schmitt

University of Nottingham

Bruce Dunham

University of Derby

Native speakers have intuitions about how frequently words occur in their language, but methodological limitations have not previously allowed a detailed description of these intuitions. This study asked native and non-native speakers to give judgements of frequency for near synonyms in 12 lexical sets and compared those responses to modern corpus word counts. The native speakers were able to discern the core word in the lexical sets either 77% or 85% of the time, depending on whether the core word was the reference against which the other words in the set were judged, with the non-native results at 71% and 79%. The correlation between the native speakers' ratings and corpus data was .530, which calls into question the higher results from previous studies. The non-native correlation was .577. A Hellinger distance procedure demonstrated generally good judgements of absolute frequency on an individual word basis. Contrary to previous findings, the correlation and Hellinger analyses indicate that natives are not homogeneous in their frequency intuitions, with education one apparent differentiating factor. The results suggest that, for lexical sets in which all words were rated, educated non-natives have intuitions of word frequency which are as good or better than natives with less education, while educated natives have better frequency intuitions than their educated non-native counterparts.

Second Language Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, 389-411 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026765899669633186


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
J. McCrostie
Investigating the Accuracy of Teachers' Word Frequency Intuitions
RELC Journal, April 1, 2007; 38(1): 53 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]