This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Slabakova, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The parameter of aspect in second language acquisition

University of Iowa

The goal of this article is to present a detailed study of the second language acquisition (SLA) of English aspect by native speakers of Slavic languages. A parameterized distinction between English and Slavic aspect accounts for the subtle differences between English and Slavic telic and atelic sentences. Based on a syntax-theoretical treatment of aspect, the article investigates the process of SLA of aspect in Slavic speakers at three levels of proficiency in English: low intermediate, high intermediate and advanced. Second language (L2) learners are found to be capable of resetting the aspectual parameter value to the English setting, thus successfully acquiring a property of language almost never taught in language classrooms. The article also studies the acquisition of a cluster of constructions, which syntactic research relates to the English value of the aspectual parameter, and which have been found to appear together in the speech of English children (Snyder and Stromswold, 1997): double objects, verb–particles and resultatives. Results indicate that each of these constructions forms part of this aspect-related cluster and that knowledge of aspect and knowledge of the cluster co-occur. The results of the experimental study bring new evidence to bear on the theoretical choice between direct access to the L2 value (Epstein et al., 1996; Flynn, 1996) or starting out the process of acquisition with the L1 value of a parameter (Schwartz & Sprouse, 1994;1996),supporting the latter view.

Second Language Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, 283-317 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026765899674229440


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Haznedar The acquisition of tense aspect in child second language English Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 383 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hara Input, triggering and poverty of the stimulus in the second language acquisition of Japanese passives Second Language Research, October 1, 2007; 23(4): 419 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Slabakova Learnability in the second language acquisition of semantics: a bidirectional study of a semantic parameter Second Language Research, October 1, 2006; 22(4): 498 - 523. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Lardiere Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001 Second Language Research, April 1, 2003; 19(2): 129 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]