Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Second Language Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure

Cynthia A. Brown

Hokkaido University

Acquisition of segmental structure in first language acquisition is accomplished through the interaction of Universal Grammar and the learner's detection of phonemic contrasts in the input (Rice and Avery, 1995; Brown and Matthews, 1993,1997). This article investigates the acquisition of the English /l–r/,/b–v/ and /f–v/ contrasts by second language learners whose L1s do not contrast these segments. Based on L1 phonological acquisition and infant speech perception research,a model of phonological interference is developed which explains how the influence of the L1 phonology originates and identifies the level of phonological knowledge that impinges upon L2 acquisition. It is proposed that if a learner's L1 grammar lacks the phonological feature that differentiates a particular non-native contrast, he or she will be unable to perceive the contrast and therefore unable to acquire the novel segmental representations. In order to evaluate this hypothesis, two experimental studies were conducted. Experiment 1 investigates the acquisition of /l/ and /r/ by Chinese and Japanese speakers; the acquisition of the /l–r/, /b–v/ and /f–v/ contrasts by Japanese speakers is compared in experiment 2. The results from an AX discrimination task and a picture selection task indicate that successful acquisition of a non-native contrast is constrained by the learner's L1 grammar. Differences between Chinese and Japanese speakers (experiment 1) and differences in the acquisition of several different contrasts among Japanese speakers (experiment 2) are argued to reflect subtle phonological properties of the learners' respective L1s. These findings demonstrate that a speaker's L1 grammar may actually impede the operation of UG, preventing the L2 learner from acquiring a non-native phonemic contrast.

Second Language Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 136-193 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026765898669508401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
E. Simon
Acquiring a new second language contrast: an analysis of the English laryngeal system of native speakers of Dutch
Second Language Research, July 1, 2009; 25(3): 377 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
R. Hayes-Harb and K. Masuda
Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts
Second Language Research, January 1, 2008; 24(1): 5 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
E. P. Altenberg
The perception of word boundaries in a second language
Second Language Research, October 1, 2005; 21(4): 325 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of BilingualismHome page
J. Matthews and C. Brown
When intake exceeds input: Language specific perceptual illusions induced by L1 prosodic constraints
International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2004; 8(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. Larson-Hall
Predicting perceptual success with segments: a test of Japanese speakers of Russian
Second Language Research, January 1, 2004; 20(1): 33 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
F. R. Eckman, A. Elreyes, and G. K. Iverson
Some principles of second language phonology
Second Language Research, July 1, 2003; 19(3): 169 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
J. Pater
The perceptual acquisition of Thai phonology by English speakers: task and stimulus effects
Second Language Research, July 1, 2003; 19(3): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
S. E. Carroll
Putting 'input' in its proper place
Second Language Research, October 1, 1999; 15(4): 337 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Second Language ResearchHome page
S. Curtin, H. Goad, and J. V. Pater
Phonological transfer and levels of representation: the perceptual acquisition of Thai voice and aspiration by English and French speakers
Second Language Research, October 1, 1998; 14(4): 389 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]