This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meisel, J. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development

University of Hamburg and Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study

The acquisition of negation is perhaps the best-studied syntactic phenomenon in early interlanguage research,and many of these publications concluded that first (L1) and second language (L2) development had much more in common than had previously been assumed. In the present paper, the problem of whether the same underlying principles and mechanisms guide L1 and L2 acquisition will be re-examined from the perspective of more recent grammatical theory. The empirical basis consists of longitudinal case-studies of the acquisition of French and German as first and second languages. The L2 learners' first language is Spanish.

In L1 data one finds a rapid, uniform and almost error-free course of development across languages exhibiting quite different morphosyntactic means of expressing negation. This is explained in terms of Parameter Theory, primarily referring to functional categories determining the placement of finite verbal elements. L2 acquisition, on the other hand, is characterized by considerable variability, not only crosslinguistically, but also across learners and even within individuals. This can be accounted for by assuming different strategies of language use. More importantly, different kinds of linguistic knowledge are drawn upon in L1 as opposed to L2. It is claimed that adult L2 learners, rather than using structure-dependent operations constrained by Universal Grammar (UG), rely primarily on linear sequencing strategies which apply to surface strings.

Second Language Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 227-263 (1997)
DOI: 10.1191/026765897666180760


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Perales, M. d. P. Garcia Mayo, and J. M. Liceras The acquisition of L3 English negation by bilingual (Spanish/Basque) learners in an institutional setting International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 3 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Montrul Review article: Second language acquisition welcomes the heritage language learner: opportunities of a new field Second Language Research, October 1, 2008; 24(4): 487 - 506. [PDF]

				I. M. Tsimpli and M. Dimitrakopoulou The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition Second Language Research, April 1, 2007; 23(2): 215 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Bolonyai (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners International Journal of Bilingualism, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Rule and E. Marsden The acquisition of functional categories in early French second language grammars: the use of finite and non-finite verbs in negative contexts Second Language Research, April 1, 2006; 22(2): 188 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Montrul Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: exploring some differences and similarities Second Language Research, July 1, 2005; 21(3): 199 - 249. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hopp Constraining second language word order optionality: scrambling in advanced English-German and Japanese-German interlanguage Second Language Research, January 1, 2005; 21(1): 34 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Haznedar The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: evidence from the acquisition of CP Second Language Research, January 1, 2003; 19(1): 1 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Slabakova Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars Second Language Research, January 1, 2003; 19(1): 42 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Ionin and K. Wexler Why is 'is' easier than '-s'?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English Second Language Research, April 1, 2002; 18(2): 95 - 136. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Franceschina Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals Second Language Research, July 1, 2001; 17(3): 213 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Herschensohn Missing inflection in second language French: accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits Second Language Research, July 1, 2001; 17(3): 273 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Dekydtspotter and R. A. Sprouse Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage Second Language Research, January 1, 2001; 17(1): 1 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Parodi Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition Second Language Research, October 1, 2000; 16(4): 355 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Prevost and L. White Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement Second Language Research, April 1, 2000; 16(2): 103 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Carroll Putting 'input' in its proper place Second Language Research, October 1, 1999; 15(4): 337 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Meisel The L2 Basic Variety as an I-language Second Language Research, October 1, 1997; 13(4): 374 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]