This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form

Slavic and Eastern Languages Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts

Several recent accounts of crosslinguistic variation in the properties of anaphors have rejected Manzini and Wexler's (1987) parameterized binding principles. Pica (1987), Battistella (1989), Cole et al. (1990) and Katada (1991), among others, claim that anaphors move in Logical Form (LF) such that 'long-distance' binding can be reduced to a series of local relationships. This article looks at research on adult second language learning in the light of the proposal that reflexives move in LF. A first approach to the issue reanalyses data from earlier research on the acquisition of the Japanese long-distance anaphor zibun, research conducted under the assumption that the binding principles are parameterized. Secondly, a new study of 58 adult learners of Japanese is presented, showing that learners' knowledge of zibun at a high-proficiency level is largely consistent with a key prediction of the movement in LF approach. Although relatively few high-proficiency learners in the subject pool seem to have arrived at the full native-speaker grammar of zibun, there is little evidence that the grammars they construct violate principles of Universal Grammar. On the other hand, data from lower-proficiency learners are less readily accounted for from the perspective of movement in LF.

Second Language Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 206-234 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839501100302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Wakabayashi Contributions of the study of Japanese as a second language to our general understanding of second language acquisition and the definition of second language acquisition research Second Language Research, January 1, 2003; 19(1): 76 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Demirci The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation by Turkish learners of English Second Language Research, October 1, 2000; 16(4): 325 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. G. Ying Access to UG and language transfer: a study of L2 learners' interpretation of reconstruction in Chinese Second Language Research, January 1, 1999; 15(1): 41 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Yuan Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers Second Language Research, October 1, 1998; 14(4): 324 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Wolfe-Quintero Nativism does not equal Universal Grammar Second Language Research, October 1, 1996; 12(4): 335 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Hamilton Against underdetermined reflexive binding Second Language Research, October 1, 1996; 12(4): 420 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]