This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lakshmanan, U. Articles by Selinker, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English

Southern Illinois University

Larry Selinker

University of London, Birkbeck College

In this article we examine the development of the complementizer system in child L2 grammars of English, and we show that C and its maximal projection CP are operative from the very beginning. Next, we focus on the development of the tensed complementizer that. We provide evidence which suggests that the tensed complementizer in embedded declaratives may be treated as an obligatorily null complementizer by these child L2 learners. We then examine restrictive relative clauses produced by our subjects. The evidence indicates that the tensed complementizer is first realized overtly as that in the relative clause domain. We speculate on the possible reasons as to why the relative clause domain should trigger the emergence of the overt tensed complementizer and we argue that recent proposals by Rizzi (1990) for a typology of complementizer types enable us to account for these child L2 developmental facts.

Second Language Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 25-48 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026765839401000102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Y.-c. Chen English prototyped small clauses in the interlanguage of Chinese/Taiwanese adult learners Second Language Research, January 1, 2005; 21(1): 1 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Haznedar The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: evidence from the acquisition of CP Second Language Research, January 1, 2003; 19(1): 1 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Bhatt and B. Hancin-Bhatt Structural Minimality, CP and the initial state in second language acquisition Second Language Research, October 1, 2002; 18(4): 348 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U. Lakshmanan and L. Selinker Analysing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, October 1, 2001; 17(4): 393 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Roebuck, M. A. Martinez-Arbelaiz, and J. I. Perez-Silva Null subjects, filled CPs and L2 acquisition Second Language Research, July 1, 1999; 15(3): 251 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Paradis, M. Le Corre, and F. Genesee The emergence of tense and agreement in child L2 French Second Language Research, July 1, 1998; 14(3): 227 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Lardiere Case and Tense in the 'fossilized' steady state Second Language Research, January 1, 1998; 14(1): 1 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Vainikka and M. Young-Scholten Gradual development of L2 phrase structure Second Language Research, January 1, 1996; 12(1): 7 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. D. Schwartz and R. A. Sprouse L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model Second Language Research, January 1, 1996; 12(1): 40 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]